anybody have experience..just want to know..

daily use, i believe it got to be NA or soft turbo as praticed by conti... :)

i agree... NA is better for daily use... i agree... NA is better for daily use...

turbo!!!.. if it is a diesel engine la..

diesel no turbo, u die standing...

boring no power...

turbo lagi mengancam...bunyi keciiing...keciiing...tu yang tak tahan tu...

Agree... zoom zoom...

would u proud for having that cool sound of turbo when u're stuck in traffic jam??? hahaha

guys. how's the fuel consumption of evo or whatever turbo cars on normal driving style??? i mean not in speed demon mood...
is it much different???

are u sure?.. did u ever test drive a trailer head without the back? don't play play..

Lol Twin or triple plated clutch in traffic jam lulzzzzz kaki also patah

u're right bro. if that thing is capable of taking 40 ton with it, imagine what is it capable of without the 40 ton on it back???
by the way, most 'trailer head' (better known as prime mover) nowadays do have turbo. even 3 or 10 tonner truck also have it...

FC for turbo car depends on how you drive it...but for short stop and go traffic like in the city...getting 7km/L also considered lucky ady...even NA car suffer to get best FC in city driving...lol...turbo only shiok when no traffic...last nite had a blast with a wiralution...got api some more from the back...then suddenly turbo when kaput ady...felt sorry to the wiralution owner...lalalala

Its all rely on how you drive it. Even its not in demon mood and you like to brake often. Its still heavy on the FC for both NA and Turbo.

For me, my current car FC is even better than GT with daily normal driving. Practicing good driving behaviour on both of them. As long as you have early torque, you are able to bring your car to cruising speed faster than NA where the latter you have to 'drag' your car to desire speed. In long terms, you burn less fuel then NA for Turbo.

But the teory doesn't apply to Japanese turbo car as most of them are in high pressure turbo settings, even very slow driving also suffer on FC.

agree on you on bro, its all depends on how you drive, my current car even got better FC comparing to GT on daily driving....however lets back to the topic instead of FC.

not really OT lah speedza.. I think most decision will falls heavily on how is the FC and then how comfortable to drive daily. cheers //

never owned a turbo car.... NA or FI for daily use or touring depend on which regular route you are taking, traffic, hilly or flat and etc.
if u don't like hirev to push your car.....FI/turbo is the answer.

i know it depend on driving style. for normal and same driving habit, style and skills, but 2 different engine. turbo and NA. is it much different in FC???

driving a FI car will make you wanna hear the kphiissshhh...kphiiishhh sound every now and then(for japanese FI car)...hahahaha...can't resist it...lol...same like bros here la dulu2 mula2 masuk TRUST muffler...every time go out must TRUST all the way to hear the jetish a like muffler sound...FC sure high...lol...

currently drive a turbo car (ralliart), a car with kompressor engine (soft turbo) and a V6's car without turbo. What can i say, a turbo car is more fun to drive compared to the others. Yes, the FC is high with an average of 6.8km/l, but the pleasure of driving the turbo car is priceless (walaupun tak ada bunyi kepiiiiisssss)

go for NA, viva 660cc. rm45 u can travel to jb from KL two flow.

i think NA better for daily use...

for me if turbo oso ok just u dun kick it la.....but sure u wont drive slow d............